I have located the motion that was filed by the D.A. late last Friday before the sentencing was heard on the following Monday the 15th. What's interesting here is the D.A. makes several mistakes here in his filing. First he talks about Prop. 46 which has nothing to do with the issue here. He must have meant Prop. 47. Then at the bottom he refers to count 47 where he must have meant count 46, as count 46 was referred to as count #3 for the Jurors. He refers to Prop. 46 as relating to theft of Guns, Fowls and Avocados. Again he meant Prop. 47. Here is the motion.
http://marycummins.com/people_sentence.pdf
On page 2 line 9 and 10 Knowles even admits to the facts here. By lines 11 and 12 he makes assumptions that the Jury must have meant to charge $759K as the theft. You can't do that, not even the Judge would make that assumption as neither a theft or for restitution. By line 25-28 Knowles requests the high prison term of 3 years because the amount he believes was stolen to be over $100K.
On Page 3 line 13, Knowles says, "the court must make an order regarding restitution" The Judge would not.
Line 14-19 the D.A. makes all this stuff up even to the point that he believes that he can guess what the Jurors must have meant to award an new arbitrary number of $375K and by line 20 he once again makes the statement, "therefore that is the amount the people recommend to the court as restitution in this case". The Judge did not and would not, therefore he must have ruled it a misdemeanor and dismissed the case due to the statue of limitations of petty theft of 1 year. As such he made several "Reversal Errors" here. This should be an easy appeal for the Judges in the Appellate Court. A first year law student wouldn't have gotten it so wrong.
Judge Richman doesn't get demoted to Traffic Court in Inglewood, the D.A. and the Judge don't get sued by Michelson and everybody is happy, except the defendants who made Gary Millions of dollars despite his continued statements of being cheated out of millions of dollars. Look up Love vs People again. He can't do that, it's case law.
Dr Gary Michelson, Michelson Prize, $75 million, Found Animals Foundation, Dr. Gary Michelson, Gary Michelson, Gary, Michelson, Gerald, Michaelson, Gary Michaelson, G Karlin Michelson, Mary Cummins, Animal Advocates, marycummins.com, animaladvocates.us, Gary Karlin Michelson, Gary K Michelson, Karlin Michelson, Alya Michelson, Aimee Gilbreath, teak, farm, billionaire, Forbes, lawsuit, worth, married, fraud, pitbull, purebred, bribe, bribery, patent, spine, animal nut, patent troll, thief, criminal, childhood, philadelphia, pennsylvania, boca de canon, Los Angeles, California, Ed Boks, Edward Boks, Antonio Villaraigosa, steve cooley, jackie lacey, campaign, donation, district attorney, inventor, hall of fame, grandmother, hand, fire, burn, 20, million minds, text book, free, surgery, surgical, twenty million minds, dog, high school, law, lawyer, doctor, dr., Michelson Medical Research Foundation, foundation, wilshire, Karlin Asset Management, KAM, Found Animals Legislative Fund, mom, dad, mother, father, brother, Gracie, bull, spay, neuter, adopt, buy, capital, karlin ventures, david cohen, tianxiang zhuo, spinal, surgeon, ceo, Karlin Real Estate, charity, 501 3c, irs, nonprofit, non-profit, Gary Karlin Michelson M D Charitable Foundation, gay, homosexual, wayne pacelle, hsus, animal services, temple university, medical, school, born, flake, crazy, central high school, Hahnemann Medical College, drexel, jewish, russian, Medtronic, Wikipedia, grant, $25, $50, Kremlin, mail order bride, Karlin Holdings Limited Partnership, C & M Investment Group Limited, michelson technology at work, Infuse class action lawsuit, Karlin Opportunity Fund, Karlin OP, Medical Research Foundation Trust, Alya Michelson, Alya Gold, Alevtina Gold Michelson, Tina Gold, Alevtina Shchepetina, Alexander Shchepetina, Алевтина Щепетина, александр щепетин, sasha, ria novosti, USC, Japanica, Russian mail order bride, T'n'G, test tube girl, smile, orel, russia, moscow, journalist, pathological liar, #deanflorez #foundanimalsorg #alyamichelson #20MillionMinds #drGaryMichelson #GaryMichelson #20MM #JAPANICA #Forbes #billionaire #infuse #lawsuit #classaction
Dr. Gary Karlin Michelson, Found Animals Foundation, Forbes billionaire, 20 Million Minds, Alya
Dr. Gary Karlin Michelson, Found Animals Foundation, Forbes billionaire, 20 Million Minds, Alya
Showing posts with label felony. Show all posts
Showing posts with label felony. Show all posts
Friday, December 19, 2014
Thursday, December 18, 2014
Judge Craig Richman should have reduced charge to misdemeanor then dismissed it
This next bit confirms my thoughts about the improper ruling by Judge Craig Richman. It really boggles my mind that the Judge should have reduced it to a misdemeanor then dismissed it based on case law but he chose not to. He had this case to back his decision but decided on his own not to rule. He will now force Neil and Richard to live out three or four years of appeal hell. They can't get a job, Richard can't leave the state... And all for what? So Judge Craig Richman can continue being a judge with the support of the DA. He doesn't want to piss anyone off so he doesn't have to deal with the City Attorney allowing another crazy person to file assault charges against him. I would like to note in that case Judge Craig Richman was not 100% innocent it turns out. The crazy lady threw a bag of dog shit in his car. He then as per his own statement pushed her. He also lied and told her he was a police officer. That is a crime in and of itself. Then she pushed him. During that case he had to step down from the bench during the investigation and trial. Sounds like judicial politics to me. I agree the charges should have been dropped. http://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/04/local/la-me-ln-judge-dog-poop-battery-trial-20140204
Below is an almost identical case to the Powers/Campbell case in which the defendants were convicted of felony charges but the Jurors made no restitution or findings in the amount over $400 so the Appellate Court ruled them misdemeanors from felonies. This is now "CASE LAW." Jonathan Michaels argued this case after lunch with the Judge saying, "lets forget about prop. 47 for a minute and look at this CASE LAW which makes published findings that you must reduce the count to a misdemeanor as the findings are identical to our case".
Judge Richman basically said, "that's a very good argument Mr. Michaels but I'm sticking with my earlier decision to NOT RULE, I may be wrong and I've been wrong before and you may be right and I invite you to appeal, and I expect you will, however I am letting the Jurors decision on one count of Felony Grand Theft to stand and I will not rule on a presumption of knowing what the Jurors decision would have been as far as restitution."
Jonathan then argued that is exactly the point and said, "Upon the failure of the jury to so determine, the degree of the crime with no stated restitution amount then it shall be deemed to be of the lesser degree, a misdemeanor by the court.”
"This is the published findings of the Appellate Court."
Since 2008 the amount of petty theft misdemeanor has been raised to $950 from the previous $400. Still the Judge did not even find a restitution in the amount of over the misdemeanor threshold.
PEOPLE v. LOVE
Court of Appeal, Third District, California.
The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Sumaria LOVE, Defendant and Appellant.
No. C055398.
Decided: September 16, 2008
Patricia L. Brisbois, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Janis Shank McClean, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Tia M. Coronado, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
A jury convicted defendant Sumaria Love of 15 counts of various identity theft-based offenses arising from abuse of her position of trust as a dental receptionist.
On appeal, defendant makes four claims: (1) her conviction in count eight of fraudulently using an access (credit) card was only an attempted offense; (2) the prohibition upon dual convictions for theft and receipt of the same property bars her from being convicted both of fraudulent use of an access card in count twelve and receiving stolen property in count fifteen; (3) her felony convictions in counts four, eight, twelve and thirteen must be reduced to misdemeanors because the jury never determined the amount taken; and (4) the trial court's imposition of an upper-term sentence violated her rights to a jury trial and due process under the Fourteenth and Sixth Amendments.
The published portion of this opinion encompasses defendant's first three claims and we agree with the latter two of them. Accordingly, we strike defendant's conviction in count fifteen and remand the convictions in counts four, eight, twelve and thirteen for re-sentencing as misdemeanors. We disagree with defendant's first claim. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we reject defendant's fourth claim.
Background
Counts Four, Eight, Twelve, and Thirteen as Misdemeanors Based on Amounts Taken Not Determined⌑ Defendant next contends that her convictions for grand theft in counts four, eight, twelve, and thirteen must be reduced to misdemeanors because the jury did not find that the value of the items obtained exceeded $400. The People have conceded the merit of this argument, and we agree.
In counts four, eight, and twelve, the jury convicted defendant of grand theft under section 484g, subdivision (a). Section 484g, subdivision (a) provides, “[I]f the value of all money, goods, services, and other things of value obtained in violation of this section exceeds four hundred dollars ($400) in any consecutive six-month period, then the same shall constitute grand theft.” Otherwise, the statute dictates the proper conviction as “petty theft,” a misdemeanor. (See §§ 484g, subd. (a), 488, 490.)
In count thirteen (the postage meter), the jury convicted defendant of embezzlement, a form of theft, under section 508. (§ 490a.) Embezzlement is punishable as grand theft if the value of the property taken exceeds $400 (§ 487, subd. (a)) or “[w]here the ․ property is taken by a servant, agent, or employee from his or her principal or employer and aggregates four hundred dollars ($400) or more in any 12 consecutive month period.” (§ 487, subd. (b)(3).) Otherwise, it is punishable only as petty theft. (§ 488.)
In all four of these counts, the jury was required to determine the degree of the offense under section 1157, which provides: “Whenever a defendant is convicted of a crime or attempt to commit a crime which is distinguished into degrees, the jury ․ must find the degree of the crime or attempted crime of which he is guilty. Upon the failure of the jury ․ to so determine, the degree of the crime or attempted crime ․ shall be deemed to be of the lesser degree.” The People acknowledge that section 1157 applies to defendant's case. The offenses of which defendant was convicted, sections 484g, subdivision (a), and 508, require that the jury make the determination of degree, based upon its finding whether the value of the property taken exceeded $400 or not.
Here, the jury made no findings as to the value of the items obtained. As for counts eight and twelve, the trial court initially instructed the jury to make a finding as to the value of the property obtained by defendant's fraudulent use of the access card information (CALCRIM No. 3220.) However, the trial court withdrew this instruction following a question by the jury as to whether the property actually had to be received in order for a value to be placed upon it. The court gave no instruction to assess a value for count four or count thirteen.
Because the jury did not find that the value of the items obtained exceeded $400 in counts four, eight, twelve, or thirteen, these felony convictions must be reduced to misdemeanors and defendant must be re-sentenced.
The convictions in counts four, eight, twelve, and thirteen are reduced to misdemeanors and the case is remanded for re-sentencing. Defendant's conviction in count fifteen is stricken.
Dr Gary Michelson, Michelson Prize, $75 million, Found Animals Foundation, Dr. Gary Michelson, Gary Michelson, Gary, Michelson, Gerald, Michaelson, Gary Michaelson, G Karlin Michelson, Mary Cummins, Animal Advocates, marycummins.com, animaladvocates.us, Gary Karlin Michelson, Gary K Michelson, Karlin Michelson, Alya Michelson, Aimee Gilbreath, teak, farm, billionaire, Forbes, lawsuit, worth, married, fraud, pitbull, purebred, bribe, bribery, patent, spine, animal nut, patent troll, thief, criminal, childhood, philadelphia, pennsylvania, boca de canon, Los Angeles, California, Ed Boks, Edward Boks, Antonio Villaraigosa, steve cooley, jackie lacey, campaign, donation, district attorney, inventor, hall of fame, grandmother, hand, fire, burn, 20, million minds, text book, free, surgery, surgical, twenty million minds, dog, high school, law, lawyer, doctor, dr., Michelson Medical Research Foundation, foundation, wilshire, Karlin Asset Management, KAM, Found Animals Legislative Fund, mom, dad, mother, father, brother, Gracie, bull, spay, neuter, adopt, buy, capital, karlin ventures, david cohen, tianxiang zhuo, spinal, surgeon, ceo, Karlin Real Estate, charity, 501 3c, irs, nonprofit, non-profit, Gary Karlin Michelson M D Charitable Foundation, gay, homosexual, wayne pacelle, hsus, animal services, temple university, medical, school, born, flake, crazy, central high school, Hahnemann Medical College, drexel, jewish, russian, Medtronic, Wikipedia, grant, $25, $50, Kremlin, mail order bride, Karlin Holdings Limited Partnership, C & M Investment Group Limited, michelson technology at work, Infuse class action lawsuit, Karlin Opportunity Fund, Karlin OP, Medical Research Foundation Trust, Alya Michelson, Alya Gold, Alevtina Gold Michelson, Tina Gold, Alevtina Shchepetina, Alexander Shchepetina, Алевтина Щепетина, александр щепетин, sasha, ria novosti, USC, Japanica, Russian mail order bride, T'n'G, test tube girl, smile, orel, russia, moscow, journalist, pathological liar, #deanflorez #foundanimalsorg #alyamichelson #20MillionMinds #drGaryMichelson #GaryMichelson #20MM #JAPANICA #Forbes #billionaire #infuse #lawsuit #classaction
Below is an almost identical case to the Powers/Campbell case in which the defendants were convicted of felony charges but the Jurors made no restitution or findings in the amount over $400 so the Appellate Court ruled them misdemeanors from felonies. This is now "CASE LAW." Jonathan Michaels argued this case after lunch with the Judge saying, "lets forget about prop. 47 for a minute and look at this CASE LAW which makes published findings that you must reduce the count to a misdemeanor as the findings are identical to our case".
Judge Richman basically said, "that's a very good argument Mr. Michaels but I'm sticking with my earlier decision to NOT RULE, I may be wrong and I've been wrong before and you may be right and I invite you to appeal, and I expect you will, however I am letting the Jurors decision on one count of Felony Grand Theft to stand and I will not rule on a presumption of knowing what the Jurors decision would have been as far as restitution."
Jonathan then argued that is exactly the point and said, "Upon the failure of the jury to so determine, the degree of the crime with no stated restitution amount then it shall be deemed to be of the lesser degree, a misdemeanor by the court.”
"This is the published findings of the Appellate Court."
Since 2008 the amount of petty theft misdemeanor has been raised to $950 from the previous $400. Still the Judge did not even find a restitution in the amount of over the misdemeanor threshold.
PEOPLE v. LOVE
Court of Appeal, Third District, California.
The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Sumaria LOVE, Defendant and Appellant.
No. C055398.
Decided: September 16, 2008
Patricia L. Brisbois, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Janis Shank McClean, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Tia M. Coronado, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
A jury convicted defendant Sumaria Love of 15 counts of various identity theft-based offenses arising from abuse of her position of trust as a dental receptionist.
On appeal, defendant makes four claims: (1) her conviction in count eight of fraudulently using an access (credit) card was only an attempted offense; (2) the prohibition upon dual convictions for theft and receipt of the same property bars her from being convicted both of fraudulent use of an access card in count twelve and receiving stolen property in count fifteen; (3) her felony convictions in counts four, eight, twelve and thirteen must be reduced to misdemeanors because the jury never determined the amount taken; and (4) the trial court's imposition of an upper-term sentence violated her rights to a jury trial and due process under the Fourteenth and Sixth Amendments.
The published portion of this opinion encompasses defendant's first three claims and we agree with the latter two of them. Accordingly, we strike defendant's conviction in count fifteen and remand the convictions in counts four, eight, twelve and thirteen for re-sentencing as misdemeanors. We disagree with defendant's first claim. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we reject defendant's fourth claim.
Background
Counts Four, Eight, Twelve, and Thirteen as Misdemeanors Based on Amounts Taken Not Determined⌑ Defendant next contends that her convictions for grand theft in counts four, eight, twelve, and thirteen must be reduced to misdemeanors because the jury did not find that the value of the items obtained exceeded $400. The People have conceded the merit of this argument, and we agree.
In counts four, eight, and twelve, the jury convicted defendant of grand theft under section 484g, subdivision (a). Section 484g, subdivision (a) provides, “[I]f the value of all money, goods, services, and other things of value obtained in violation of this section exceeds four hundred dollars ($400) in any consecutive six-month period, then the same shall constitute grand theft.” Otherwise, the statute dictates the proper conviction as “petty theft,” a misdemeanor. (See §§ 484g, subd. (a), 488, 490.)
In count thirteen (the postage meter), the jury convicted defendant of embezzlement, a form of theft, under section 508. (§ 490a.) Embezzlement is punishable as grand theft if the value of the property taken exceeds $400 (§ 487, subd. (a)) or “[w]here the ․ property is taken by a servant, agent, or employee from his or her principal or employer and aggregates four hundred dollars ($400) or more in any 12 consecutive month period.” (§ 487, subd. (b)(3).) Otherwise, it is punishable only as petty theft. (§ 488.)
In all four of these counts, the jury was required to determine the degree of the offense under section 1157, which provides: “Whenever a defendant is convicted of a crime or attempt to commit a crime which is distinguished into degrees, the jury ․ must find the degree of the crime or attempted crime of which he is guilty. Upon the failure of the jury ․ to so determine, the degree of the crime or attempted crime ․ shall be deemed to be of the lesser degree.” The People acknowledge that section 1157 applies to defendant's case. The offenses of which defendant was convicted, sections 484g, subdivision (a), and 508, require that the jury make the determination of degree, based upon its finding whether the value of the property taken exceeded $400 or not.
Here, the jury made no findings as to the value of the items obtained. As for counts eight and twelve, the trial court initially instructed the jury to make a finding as to the value of the property obtained by defendant's fraudulent use of the access card information (CALCRIM No. 3220.) However, the trial court withdrew this instruction following a question by the jury as to whether the property actually had to be received in order for a value to be placed upon it. The court gave no instruction to assess a value for count four or count thirteen.
Because the jury did not find that the value of the items obtained exceeded $400 in counts four, eight, twelve, or thirteen, these felony convictions must be reduced to misdemeanors and defendant must be re-sentenced.
The convictions in counts four, eight, twelve, and thirteen are reduced to misdemeanors and the case is remanded for re-sentencing. Defendant's conviction in count fifteen is stricken.
Dr Gary Michelson, Michelson Prize, $75 million, Found Animals Foundation, Dr. Gary Michelson, Gary Michelson, Gary, Michelson, Gerald, Michaelson, Gary Michaelson, G Karlin Michelson, Mary Cummins, Animal Advocates, marycummins.com, animaladvocates.us, Gary Karlin Michelson, Gary K Michelson, Karlin Michelson, Alya Michelson, Aimee Gilbreath, teak, farm, billionaire, Forbes, lawsuit, worth, married, fraud, pitbull, purebred, bribe, bribery, patent, spine, animal nut, patent troll, thief, criminal, childhood, philadelphia, pennsylvania, boca de canon, Los Angeles, California, Ed Boks, Edward Boks, Antonio Villaraigosa, steve cooley, jackie lacey, campaign, donation, district attorney, inventor, hall of fame, grandmother, hand, fire, burn, 20, million minds, text book, free, surgery, surgical, twenty million minds, dog, high school, law, lawyer, doctor, dr., Michelson Medical Research Foundation, foundation, wilshire, Karlin Asset Management, KAM, Found Animals Legislative Fund, mom, dad, mother, father, brother, Gracie, bull, spay, neuter, adopt, buy, capital, karlin ventures, david cohen, tianxiang zhuo, spinal, surgeon, ceo, Karlin Real Estate, charity, 501 3c, irs, nonprofit, non-profit, Gary Karlin Michelson M D Charitable Foundation, gay, homosexual, wayne pacelle, hsus, animal services, temple university, medical, school, born, flake, crazy, central high school, Hahnemann Medical College, drexel, jewish, russian, Medtronic, Wikipedia, grant, $25, $50, Kremlin, mail order bride, Karlin Holdings Limited Partnership, C & M Investment Group Limited, michelson technology at work, Infuse class action lawsuit, Karlin Opportunity Fund, Karlin OP, Medical Research Foundation Trust, Alya Michelson, Alya Gold, Alevtina Gold Michelson, Tina Gold, Alevtina Shchepetina, Alexander Shchepetina, Алевтина Щепетина, александр щепетин, sasha, ria novosti, USC, Japanica, Russian mail order bride, T'n'G, test tube girl, smile, orel, russia, moscow, journalist, pathological liar, #deanflorez #foundanimalsorg #alyamichelson #20MillionMinds #drGaryMichelson #GaryMichelson #20MM #JAPANICA #Forbes #billionaire #infuse #lawsuit #classaction
Monday, June 9, 2014
Dr Gary Michelson's bizarre testimony today - Forbes billionaire crazy
During the entire time that I've known Gary Michelson I have always found him to be bizarre. I used to consider him just eccentric but now I know better. Today he took his bizarre to a whole new level. He truly lives in his own reality which he created out of thin air. My comments are in parenthesis.
I missed the first half but was caught up. The Judge had a meeting with Gary Michelson's attorney Luke Dauchot and the other lawyers in chambers on the record. Then the Judge spoke in chambers ex party with Luke Dauchot off the record for three minutes or so.
Part of the audio of the interview with Gary Michelson and Villasenor was played. Gary Michelson admitted he had a meeting with DA Steve Cooley. Gary stated he sold most of the property recently for $32M. (some believe he probably sold it to a straw person to try to make it appear it was not worth as much) Previously he stated there were no appraisals. Then he stated there was an appraisal for $100M by Martine a teak expert whom he hired. Gary paid apx $25M for the land. In mediation P offered him $40M but Gary refused. His original claim stated he lost $5M. Person in charge of his farms after P appraised land at $100M. (Obviously Gary made money and didn't lose any).
1:30 N's attorney Johnathan Michelson (JM) had Gary on the stand. He questions him about when Gary knew something was wrong.( This deals with statute of limitations. Getting straight answers out of Gary was like pulling teeth today. He also had some truly bizarre responses. Gary's lawyer was not there after 12.)
JM questioned Gary about his previous sworn statements which show Gary was concerned something was wrong beginning of 2005 and end of 2005. (You have 3 years from the fraud or discovery of the fraud to file a civil suit. For a criminal prosecution, the statute of limitations for a felony fraud is 4 years. This case should be thrown out based on statute of limitations alone. I think Gary filed the criminal complaint in CR 2007, one here March 2012 or seven years later. Gary sued P in CA civil court in 2007. Why did he wait so long to file the criminal complaint? Probably because he had no yet schmoozed DA Steve Cooley and LAPD knows he's crazy. Gary donated to Cooley in 2010 and his replacement in 2012).
2005 Gary asked for records for land sales, expenses from P. Supposedly P gave him one excuse after another. 2005 David Cohen thought something was wrong. Gary said he, Gary did not think so. He goes back and forth with this. (He forgets yesterday he said Cohen took over all business for him in 2005 because Gary admitted he was a bad business man.)
March 26, 2006 Gary went to CR to meet with Martine who had taken over running his farms. At that time he realized that P was taking multiple commissions on the sales. (Yesterday Gary said he never went to CR. Today we find out he was there three times)
Gary bought 147 properties in all. Gary got a $24M judgement against N. Gary stated "I didn't get a penny from N!" JM asked him if Gary got $2M from the forced sale of N's home. Gary says "no!" (Everyone is confused by his answer. Gary got a judgment, sued N in Florida and forced the sale of his home. I posted all the docs here previously.) Gary continues "I didn't get a penny!" JM again asks "didn't you or one of your holding companies get money from the sale of N's home?" Gary said "that was my home! It was MY house!" JM asks "did you live in it, ever go there, did you buy it?" Gary says "no."(It was N's home. In Gary's odd mind he feels that because N used some money he got from Gary to buy the home that he Gary actually owned it. N had money from the sale of his Dana Point home.) JM says "let's not be cute here" to which Gary replies "I'm not being cute. I take offense!" Judge tells them to knock off with personal comments. Gary ultimately admits that perhaps one of his holding companies might have received the funds from the sale. (Trying to get a direct answer was so difficult today. Gary danced around when he thought there was something wrong. If he filed a criminal complaint in CR in 2007 and admitted in that complaint he knew something was wrong in 2005, the statute of limitations are over here in CA. Gary also admits he lost no money. Case closed at least to Powers)
In Gary's CA criminal complaint he states he the victim wired $28M up to March 2006. He bought 23,000 acres. 2014 he sold 21,000 acres with trees for $32M. He still has 2,000 acres. (Obviously there is no loss here but Gary still claims he lost money. Plus, if it was appraised at $100M by Gary's own expert, why sell for $32M?)
In 2012 Gary admits he had lunch with DA Steve Cooley and the main people in the DA's office while his criminal matter was pending. Gary was invited by a secretary of Cooley to have lunch so Gary could thank them for their help in this case. Gary ended up paying for lunch. Gary admits his lawyers gave docs to DA Steve Cooley. Gary said that was the only time he'd met with Cooley. (Not true. Cooley invited him to stand next to him in a press conference. I posted pics. Gary then gave Cooley an award at a big event in his honor. I posted the event with pics. In that event Gary gave Cooley an award for something he had nothing to do with)
P said he had someone who was willing to buy Gary's land for $60M. Previously Gary said "if it's worth $80M, I'll take $60M, you P can keep the $20M and we can all go home."( Today his answer changed. If Gary had sold it then there would have been no case at all.) Gary was upset that he couldn't sell it for $120M. Gary admits he did not find the properties or improve them. P did that.
U cross examined Gary. Did you know Knowles and Villasenor were working on your case when you went to lunch with Cooley? At first Gary hemmed and hawed then he admitted that he did know because he'd met with them. U asked him why Knowles and Villasenor were not at lunch when they were the actual people working on the case? Gary said he did not know. Previously he said he had lunch with a woman, Cooley, Chief, Asst Chief, head of investigations unit at a restaurant on Sunset to thank them for their work on his, this case.
U shows him P's "consulting agreement." U asked Gary if there is a 6% commission in the consulting agreement? Gary said no. March and April 2003 you expressed concerns about P? Gary went on a little rant and U said "objection, strike, non-responsive."
U then showed Gary a letter from his lawyer Capps to Gary from 2003 about concerns Gary had with P. Judge ruled even though it's a lawyer communication which would be privileged, the DA gave it to Defendants so it's now in the public domain. (Generally this can mean that ALL attorney/client privileges are waived if the party puts a privileged communication in the public domain). In the letter Capps is concerned about purchases.
Gary again refuses to admit that C&M bought property from P. Gary insists he bought directly from seller via Neil and C&M. Obviously that is not the case.
Break. Judge says he has an important out of country appt on Friday so we need to finish by Thursday. We will start earlier, end later and shorter lunch. Start at 8:30, one hour lunch and end at 4:30.
Gary then confers in private with K. Later Gary again confers with K asking him questions. We take a break. As I go out an FBI looking buy with two full semi-auto mags on his belt walks in the court room. When we go back in that FBI guy walks out of the Judge's chambers right ahead of the judge.
Back from break. U retracts exhibit E because of an issue. 7/2006 letter P said he had a buyer for the prop for $60M minus a commission to P. Capps responded to P stating the prop is not for sale. Gary said he didn't want to sell if P was in the deal and got a commission. (What an idiot. He also said something different yesterday which I posted above) Next second Gary said he" would have sold for $60M in a heart beat." (I assume this means without P getting a commission.)
Gary said he relied on P's sense of value of the property. He said he paid what P told him to pay. Karlin Holdings is Gary who wired the money. Gary also owns GHM. C&M is Campbell and Michelson.
JM asked him why he bought the land. Gary responded "I wanted to do good in the world by planting trees. It was also a good investment. I improved the world by planting trees." (And now he's wasted a whole forest of trees in the paper involved in this silly case.)
Gary stated N came to him and said he really needed $500K as he was in big trouble. Gary offered to loan him the money but N said he'd prefer if Gary bought him out. Gary bought out N's less than .5% interest in C&M for $500K. (If it were .5% that means C&M was worth $100M.) August 2008 Gary bought out N.
Early 2005 Gary asked Munoz to find out how much the sellers were paid for their property by P. Gary found out it was a lot less. Munoz was Gary's lawyer in CR. Gary spoke with N and P who said they sometimes had to pay with cash in some odd deals where the actual sales price was not correctly listed. N and P blamed it on the sellers. Gary said he believed that explanation.
Andrea Martine got information to give to Gary January 2007. The report stated that only 27% of the land had trees planted on it. P supposedly stated that 70%+ of the land could be planted. (Maybe all the trees weren't planted yet?) Martine said only 10% of the land is good to plant teak. U objected as Gary was stating facts but Judge over ruled stating Gary is just giving his thoughts, frame of mind. His testimony is not being accepted as facts.
Lunch with Steve Cooley was August 27, 2013. This came from April 2014 email from K.
U asked Gary if he ever rejected a property P offered him. Gary said no. (this is not true). U did the math on value of N's share being $100M. Gary then said that N's shares weren't worth that much but N said he needed the money so Gary gave it to him. Originally Gary said N figured out his shares were worth $500K.
JM Is this your partnership agreement with N? (it was one page) Gary said yes but there was also another agreement. (A one page agreement? I doubt there was a fiduciary clause or anything like that in a one page agreement).
April 30, 2013 K sent an email saying lunch was at a restaurant on Sunset called Freniente? Herb Hazel, Chief, Assit chief, Captain Beemer? and woman were there. The purpose of the lunch was to thank those who worked on the case. V and K were not there. JM asked why not? Gary said he didn't know. (Gary previously donated to Cooley in 2010. Gary donated to current DA in 2012 immediately before this criminal investigation began.)
In 2005 Munoz found out the sales prices of the land. Gary said no. JM then said "you deny the criminal complaint you made in CR which says this?" Finally Gary admits what he wrote in his 2007 criminal complaint in CR. Gary tried to deny most of his sworn statements today but finally admitted the statements were true at that time. Then he admits he knew something was wrong in 2005.
JM asked Gary his net worth. K objected. (Gary as per what he tells Forbes is worth $1.5B. Forbes gets the numbers from the person. They don't verify anything. Gary also publicly stated he did very well financially in teak farms in interviews and in his website)
U, Exhibit E has a date of April 2003 and July 2003. Gary pointed it out earlier. This came from the DA. (That would mean it came from Gary's attorneys). Gary says he only recognizes the first page, not the rest and that isn't his signature. The letter is from P to Gary stating teak is a long term investment. You must hold for 20 years to realize the true gain. It says by the 5th year you will get your original investment back. After 20 years you will have $36M if you invested $9M.
4:10 pm. Gary may be recalled to the stand to answer to exhibit E. K must produce the original. J told Gary not to talk to any other witnesses in this case until end of prelim.
K said he has a forensic accountant, real estate deed expert and computer forensic expert to call as witnesses. H said he has an objection as to almost every exhibit by prosecution and one witness.
(I have a feeling K is not too happy with Gary being such a horrible witness on the stand.)
Dr Gary Michelson, Michelson Prize, $75 million, Found Animals Foundation, Dr. Gary Michelson, Gary Michelson, Gary, Michelson, Gerald, Michaelson, Gary Michaelson, G Karlin Michelson, Mary Cummins, Animal Advocates, marycummins.com, animaladvocates.us, Gary Karlin Michelson, Gary K Michelson, Karlin Michelson, Alya Michelson, Aimee Gilbreath, teak, farm, billionaire, Forbes, lawsuit, worth, married, fraud, pitbull, purebred, bribe, bribery, patent, spine, animal nut, patent troll, thief, criminal, childhood, philadelphia, pennsylvania, boca de canon, Los Angeles, California, Ed Boks, Edward Boks, Antonio Villaraigosa, steve cooley, jackie lacey, campaign, donation, district attorney, inventor, hall of fame, grandmother, hand, fire, burn, 20, million minds, text book, free, surgery, surgical, twenty million minds, dog, high school, law, lawyer, doctor, dr., Michelson Medical Research Foundation, foundation, wilshire, Karlin Asset Management, KAM, Found Animals Legislative Fund, mom, dad, mother, father, brother, Gracie, bull, spay, neuter, adopt, buy, capital, karlin ventures, david cohen, tianxiang zhuo, spinal, surgeon, ceo, Karlin Real Estate, charity, 501 3c, irs, nonprofit, non-profit, Gary Karlin Michelson M D Charitable Foundation, gay, homosexual, wayne pacelle, hsus, animal services, temple university, medical, school, born, flake, crazy, central high school, Hahnemann Medical College, drexel, jewish, russian, Medtronic, Wikipedia, grant, $25, $50, Kremlin, mail order bride, Karlin Holdings Limited Partnership, C & M Investment Group Limited, michelson technology at work, Infuse class action lawsuit, Karlin Opportunity Fund, Karlin OP, Medical Research Foundation Trust, Alya Michelson, Alya Gold, Alevtina Gold Michelson, Tina Gold, Alevtina Shchepetina, Alexander Shchepetina, Алевтина Щепетина, александр щепетин, sasha, ria novosti, USC, Japanica, Russian mail order bride, T'n'G, test tube girl, smile, orel, russia, moscow, journalist, pathological liar, #deanflorez #foundanimalsorg #alyamichelson #20MillionMinds #drGaryMichelson #GaryMichelson #20MM #JAPANICA #Forbes #billionaire #infuse #lawsuit #classaction
I missed the first half but was caught up. The Judge had a meeting with Gary Michelson's attorney Luke Dauchot and the other lawyers in chambers on the record. Then the Judge spoke in chambers ex party with Luke Dauchot off the record for three minutes or so.
Part of the audio of the interview with Gary Michelson and Villasenor was played. Gary Michelson admitted he had a meeting with DA Steve Cooley. Gary stated he sold most of the property recently for $32M. (some believe he probably sold it to a straw person to try to make it appear it was not worth as much) Previously he stated there were no appraisals. Then he stated there was an appraisal for $100M by Martine a teak expert whom he hired. Gary paid apx $25M for the land. In mediation P offered him $40M but Gary refused. His original claim stated he lost $5M. Person in charge of his farms after P appraised land at $100M. (Obviously Gary made money and didn't lose any).
1:30 N's attorney Johnathan Michelson (JM) had Gary on the stand. He questions him about when Gary knew something was wrong.( This deals with statute of limitations. Getting straight answers out of Gary was like pulling teeth today. He also had some truly bizarre responses. Gary's lawyer was not there after 12.)
JM questioned Gary about his previous sworn statements which show Gary was concerned something was wrong beginning of 2005 and end of 2005. (You have 3 years from the fraud or discovery of the fraud to file a civil suit. For a criminal prosecution, the statute of limitations for a felony fraud is 4 years. This case should be thrown out based on statute of limitations alone. I think Gary filed the criminal complaint in CR 2007, one here March 2012 or seven years later. Gary sued P in CA civil court in 2007. Why did he wait so long to file the criminal complaint? Probably because he had no yet schmoozed DA Steve Cooley and LAPD knows he's crazy. Gary donated to Cooley in 2010 and his replacement in 2012).
2005 Gary asked for records for land sales, expenses from P. Supposedly P gave him one excuse after another. 2005 David Cohen thought something was wrong. Gary said he, Gary did not think so. He goes back and forth with this. (He forgets yesterday he said Cohen took over all business for him in 2005 because Gary admitted he was a bad business man.)
March 26, 2006 Gary went to CR to meet with Martine who had taken over running his farms. At that time he realized that P was taking multiple commissions on the sales. (Yesterday Gary said he never went to CR. Today we find out he was there three times)
Gary bought 147 properties in all. Gary got a $24M judgement against N. Gary stated "I didn't get a penny from N!" JM asked him if Gary got $2M from the forced sale of N's home. Gary says "no!" (Everyone is confused by his answer. Gary got a judgment, sued N in Florida and forced the sale of his home. I posted all the docs here previously.) Gary continues "I didn't get a penny!" JM again asks "didn't you or one of your holding companies get money from the sale of N's home?" Gary said "that was my home! It was MY house!" JM asks "did you live in it, ever go there, did you buy it?" Gary says "no."(It was N's home. In Gary's odd mind he feels that because N used some money he got from Gary to buy the home that he Gary actually owned it. N had money from the sale of his Dana Point home.) JM says "let's not be cute here" to which Gary replies "I'm not being cute. I take offense!" Judge tells them to knock off with personal comments. Gary ultimately admits that perhaps one of his holding companies might have received the funds from the sale. (Trying to get a direct answer was so difficult today. Gary danced around when he thought there was something wrong. If he filed a criminal complaint in CR in 2007 and admitted in that complaint he knew something was wrong in 2005, the statute of limitations are over here in CA. Gary also admits he lost no money. Case closed at least to Powers)
In Gary's CA criminal complaint he states he the victim wired $28M up to March 2006. He bought 23,000 acres. 2014 he sold 21,000 acres with trees for $32M. He still has 2,000 acres. (Obviously there is no loss here but Gary still claims he lost money. Plus, if it was appraised at $100M by Gary's own expert, why sell for $32M?)
In 2012 Gary admits he had lunch with DA Steve Cooley and the main people in the DA's office while his criminal matter was pending. Gary was invited by a secretary of Cooley to have lunch so Gary could thank them for their help in this case. Gary ended up paying for lunch. Gary admits his lawyers gave docs to DA Steve Cooley. Gary said that was the only time he'd met with Cooley. (Not true. Cooley invited him to stand next to him in a press conference. I posted pics. Gary then gave Cooley an award at a big event in his honor. I posted the event with pics. In that event Gary gave Cooley an award for something he had nothing to do with)
P said he had someone who was willing to buy Gary's land for $60M. Previously Gary said "if it's worth $80M, I'll take $60M, you P can keep the $20M and we can all go home."( Today his answer changed. If Gary had sold it then there would have been no case at all.) Gary was upset that he couldn't sell it for $120M. Gary admits he did not find the properties or improve them. P did that.
U cross examined Gary. Did you know Knowles and Villasenor were working on your case when you went to lunch with Cooley? At first Gary hemmed and hawed then he admitted that he did know because he'd met with them. U asked him why Knowles and Villasenor were not at lunch when they were the actual people working on the case? Gary said he did not know. Previously he said he had lunch with a woman, Cooley, Chief, Asst Chief, head of investigations unit at a restaurant on Sunset to thank them for their work on his, this case.
U shows him P's "consulting agreement." U asked Gary if there is a 6% commission in the consulting agreement? Gary said no. March and April 2003 you expressed concerns about P? Gary went on a little rant and U said "objection, strike, non-responsive."
U then showed Gary a letter from his lawyer Capps to Gary from 2003 about concerns Gary had with P. Judge ruled even though it's a lawyer communication which would be privileged, the DA gave it to Defendants so it's now in the public domain. (Generally this can mean that ALL attorney/client privileges are waived if the party puts a privileged communication in the public domain). In the letter Capps is concerned about purchases.
Gary again refuses to admit that C&M bought property from P. Gary insists he bought directly from seller via Neil and C&M. Obviously that is not the case.
Break. Judge says he has an important out of country appt on Friday so we need to finish by Thursday. We will start earlier, end later and shorter lunch. Start at 8:30, one hour lunch and end at 4:30.
Gary then confers in private with K. Later Gary again confers with K asking him questions. We take a break. As I go out an FBI looking buy with two full semi-auto mags on his belt walks in the court room. When we go back in that FBI guy walks out of the Judge's chambers right ahead of the judge.
Back from break. U retracts exhibit E because of an issue. 7/2006 letter P said he had a buyer for the prop for $60M minus a commission to P. Capps responded to P stating the prop is not for sale. Gary said he didn't want to sell if P was in the deal and got a commission. (What an idiot. He also said something different yesterday which I posted above) Next second Gary said he" would have sold for $60M in a heart beat." (I assume this means without P getting a commission.)
Gary said he relied on P's sense of value of the property. He said he paid what P told him to pay. Karlin Holdings is Gary who wired the money. Gary also owns GHM. C&M is Campbell and Michelson.
JM asked him why he bought the land. Gary responded "I wanted to do good in the world by planting trees. It was also a good investment. I improved the world by planting trees." (And now he's wasted a whole forest of trees in the paper involved in this silly case.)
Gary stated N came to him and said he really needed $500K as he was in big trouble. Gary offered to loan him the money but N said he'd prefer if Gary bought him out. Gary bought out N's less than .5% interest in C&M for $500K. (If it were .5% that means C&M was worth $100M.) August 2008 Gary bought out N.
Early 2005 Gary asked Munoz to find out how much the sellers were paid for their property by P. Gary found out it was a lot less. Munoz was Gary's lawyer in CR. Gary spoke with N and P who said they sometimes had to pay with cash in some odd deals where the actual sales price was not correctly listed. N and P blamed it on the sellers. Gary said he believed that explanation.
Andrea Martine got information to give to Gary January 2007. The report stated that only 27% of the land had trees planted on it. P supposedly stated that 70%+ of the land could be planted. (Maybe all the trees weren't planted yet?) Martine said only 10% of the land is good to plant teak. U objected as Gary was stating facts but Judge over ruled stating Gary is just giving his thoughts, frame of mind. His testimony is not being accepted as facts.
Lunch with Steve Cooley was August 27, 2013. This came from April 2014 email from K.
U asked Gary if he ever rejected a property P offered him. Gary said no. (this is not true). U did the math on value of N's share being $100M. Gary then said that N's shares weren't worth that much but N said he needed the money so Gary gave it to him. Originally Gary said N figured out his shares were worth $500K.
JM Is this your partnership agreement with N? (it was one page) Gary said yes but there was also another agreement. (A one page agreement? I doubt there was a fiduciary clause or anything like that in a one page agreement).
April 30, 2013 K sent an email saying lunch was at a restaurant on Sunset called Freniente? Herb Hazel, Chief, Assit chief, Captain Beemer? and woman were there. The purpose of the lunch was to thank those who worked on the case. V and K were not there. JM asked why not? Gary said he didn't know. (Gary previously donated to Cooley in 2010. Gary donated to current DA in 2012 immediately before this criminal investigation began.)
In 2005 Munoz found out the sales prices of the land. Gary said no. JM then said "you deny the criminal complaint you made in CR which says this?" Finally Gary admits what he wrote in his 2007 criminal complaint in CR. Gary tried to deny most of his sworn statements today but finally admitted the statements were true at that time. Then he admits he knew something was wrong in 2005.
JM asked Gary his net worth. K objected. (Gary as per what he tells Forbes is worth $1.5B. Forbes gets the numbers from the person. They don't verify anything. Gary also publicly stated he did very well financially in teak farms in interviews and in his website)
U, Exhibit E has a date of April 2003 and July 2003. Gary pointed it out earlier. This came from the DA. (That would mean it came from Gary's attorneys). Gary says he only recognizes the first page, not the rest and that isn't his signature. The letter is from P to Gary stating teak is a long term investment. You must hold for 20 years to realize the true gain. It says by the 5th year you will get your original investment back. After 20 years you will have $36M if you invested $9M.
4:10 pm. Gary may be recalled to the stand to answer to exhibit E. K must produce the original. J told Gary not to talk to any other witnesses in this case until end of prelim.
K said he has a forensic accountant, real estate deed expert and computer forensic expert to call as witnesses. H said he has an objection as to almost every exhibit by prosecution and one witness.
(I have a feeling K is not too happy with Gary being such a horrible witness on the stand.)
Dr Gary Michelson, Michelson Prize, $75 million, Found Animals Foundation, Dr. Gary Michelson, Gary Michelson, Gary, Michelson, Gerald, Michaelson, Gary Michaelson, G Karlin Michelson, Mary Cummins, Animal Advocates, marycummins.com, animaladvocates.us, Gary Karlin Michelson, Gary K Michelson, Karlin Michelson, Alya Michelson, Aimee Gilbreath, teak, farm, billionaire, Forbes, lawsuit, worth, married, fraud, pitbull, purebred, bribe, bribery, patent, spine, animal nut, patent troll, thief, criminal, childhood, philadelphia, pennsylvania, boca de canon, Los Angeles, California, Ed Boks, Edward Boks, Antonio Villaraigosa, steve cooley, jackie lacey, campaign, donation, district attorney, inventor, hall of fame, grandmother, hand, fire, burn, 20, million minds, text book, free, surgery, surgical, twenty million minds, dog, high school, law, lawyer, doctor, dr., Michelson Medical Research Foundation, foundation, wilshire, Karlin Asset Management, KAM, Found Animals Legislative Fund, mom, dad, mother, father, brother, Gracie, bull, spay, neuter, adopt, buy, capital, karlin ventures, david cohen, tianxiang zhuo, spinal, surgeon, ceo, Karlin Real Estate, charity, 501 3c, irs, nonprofit, non-profit, Gary Karlin Michelson M D Charitable Foundation, gay, homosexual, wayne pacelle, hsus, animal services, temple university, medical, school, born, flake, crazy, central high school, Hahnemann Medical College, drexel, jewish, russian, Medtronic, Wikipedia, grant, $25, $50, Kremlin, mail order bride, Karlin Holdings Limited Partnership, C & M Investment Group Limited, michelson technology at work, Infuse class action lawsuit, Karlin Opportunity Fund, Karlin OP, Medical Research Foundation Trust, Alya Michelson, Alya Gold, Alevtina Gold Michelson, Tina Gold, Alevtina Shchepetina, Alexander Shchepetina, Алевтина Щепетина, александр щепетин, sasha, ria novosti, USC, Japanica, Russian mail order bride, T'n'G, test tube girl, smile, orel, russia, moscow, journalist, pathological liar, #deanflorez #foundanimalsorg #alyamichelson #20MillionMinds #drGaryMichelson #GaryMichelson #20MM #JAPANICA #Forbes #billionaire #infuse #lawsuit #classaction
Monday, September 30, 2013
DA continues Neil Campbell's hearing today. More abuse of process.
I don't know the specifics as I arrived late after filing something on Hill St. I was told the DA continued the hearing to October 21, 2013 Dept 51 at 8:30. I assumed on Friday when they gave them a court room and 8:30 start time that they would hear the case today and it'd take a few hours. They did not. They did schedule to take a day to hear the case on October 21, 2013. In the meantime Neil is stuck in jail three more weeks.
Next Court Code: M51 Next Court Date: 10/21/2013 Next Court Time: 0700 Next Court Case: BA40922502
What is the reason for the continuance? I don't know. I do know that if you look at the booking info he was booked in by the DA at an LAPD station. I'm not an expert on criminal law. Hell, I'm not even one on civil law. But, I do believe they first must make a complaint to LAPD. They investigate the complaint. If and only if they feel there is merit and sufficient evidence to a felony complaint, they send it to the DA. If they think it's just a civil matter, they will not send it to the DA. The DA can then choose to prosecute it or not. DA handles felonies. CA, city attorney, handles misdemeanors, infractions, maybe some wobblers.
I went through the police academy and humane academy to become a Humane Officer so I know the basics. Obviously the Humane Academy is just animal law but the police academy covered most everything else on a basic level. I personally feel Neil and Philip have been denied their rights.
After being arrested you must be arraigned within two court days. The arraignment hearing is where you plead guilty or not guilty. After that is the preliminary hearing. "During the preliminary hearing (usually within 10 court days of the arraignment), the district attorney’s office must present evidence showing a reasonable suspicion that a felony was committed and that you did it. The judge must be convinced that there is sufficient evidence to bring you to trial. If the judge does not dismiss the charges after the preliminary hearing, a jury trial date will be set." I believe today was supposed to be Neil's preliminary hearing. It has been continued to October 21, 2013. Neil was charged with a felony. Here is his booking info.
Arrest Date: 06/19/2013 Arrest Time: 2235 Arrest Agency: 1989 Agency Description: LACO-DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Date Booked: 06/19/2013 Time Booked: 2311 Booking Location: 1989 Location Description: PD - DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Neil Campbell has now been in jail since June 7, 2013. He's been in LA County jail since June 19, 2013. He's been in jail 115 days. By his next hearing he would have been in jail 136 days. That will be 4.5 months. I believe Neil Campbell and Philip Powers have been denied their constitutional rights.
The Sixth Amendment gives us the right to a speedy trial. "The prosecution must be "ready for trial" within six months on all felonies except murder, or the charges are dismissed by action of law without regard to the merits of the case." So, no matter what the DA could keep Neil in there for another month and a half it seems unless he can arrange bail.
Dr Gary Michelson, Michelson Prize, $75 million, Found Animals Foundation, Dr. Gary Michelson, Gary Michelson, Gary, Michelson, Gerald, Michaelson, Gary Michaelson, G Karlin Michelson, Mary Cummins, Animal Advocates, marycummins.com, animaladvocates.us, Gary Karlin Michelson, Gary K Michelson, Karlin Michelson, Alya Michelson, Aimee Gilbreath, teak, farm, billionaire, Forbes, lawsuit, fraud, pitbull, purebred, bribe, bribery, patent, spine, animal nut, patent troll, thief, criminal, childhood, philadelphia, pennsylvania, boca de canon, Los Angeles, California, Ed Boks, Edward Boks, Antonio Villaraigosa, steve cooley, jackie lacey, campaign, donation, district attorney, inventor, hall of fame, grandmother, hand, fire, burn, 20, million minds, text book, free, surgery, surgical, twenty million minds, dog, high school, law, lawyer, doctor, dr., Michelson Medical Research Foundation, foundation, wilshire, Karlin Asset Management, KAM, Found Animals Legislative Fund, mom, dad, mother, father, brother, Gracie, bull, spay, neuter, adopt, buy, capital, karlin ventures, david cohen, tianxiang zhuo, spinal, surgeon, ceo, Karlin Real Estate, charity, 501 3c, irs, nonprofit, non-profit, Gary Karlin Michelson M D Charitable Foundation, gay, homosexual, wayne pacelle, hsus, animal services, temple university, medical, school, born, flake, crazy, central high school, Hahnemann Medical College, drexel, jewish, russian, Medtronic, Wikipedia, grant, $25, $50, Kremlin, mail order bride, Karlin Holdings Limited Partnership, C & M Investment Group Limited, michelson technology at work, Karlin Opportunity Fund, Karlin OP, Medical Research Foundation Trust
Next Court Code: M51 Next Court Date: 10/21/2013 Next Court Time: 0700 Next Court Case: BA40922502
What is the reason for the continuance? I don't know. I do know that if you look at the booking info he was booked in by the DA at an LAPD station. I'm not an expert on criminal law. Hell, I'm not even one on civil law. But, I do believe they first must make a complaint to LAPD. They investigate the complaint. If and only if they feel there is merit and sufficient evidence to a felony complaint, they send it to the DA. If they think it's just a civil matter, they will not send it to the DA. The DA can then choose to prosecute it or not. DA handles felonies. CA, city attorney, handles misdemeanors, infractions, maybe some wobblers.
I went through the police academy and humane academy to become a Humane Officer so I know the basics. Obviously the Humane Academy is just animal law but the police academy covered most everything else on a basic level. I personally feel Neil and Philip have been denied their rights.
After being arrested you must be arraigned within two court days. The arraignment hearing is where you plead guilty or not guilty. After that is the preliminary hearing. "During the preliminary hearing (usually within 10 court days of the arraignment), the district attorney’s office must present evidence showing a reasonable suspicion that a felony was committed and that you did it. The judge must be convinced that there is sufficient evidence to bring you to trial. If the judge does not dismiss the charges after the preliminary hearing, a jury trial date will be set." I believe today was supposed to be Neil's preliminary hearing. It has been continued to October 21, 2013. Neil was charged with a felony. Here is his booking info.
Arrest Date: 06/19/2013 Arrest Time: 2235 Arrest Agency: 1989 Agency Description: LACO-DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Date Booked: 06/19/2013 Time Booked: 2311 Booking Location: 1989 Location Description: PD - DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Neil Campbell has now been in jail since June 7, 2013. He's been in LA County jail since June 19, 2013. He's been in jail 115 days. By his next hearing he would have been in jail 136 days. That will be 4.5 months. I believe Neil Campbell and Philip Powers have been denied their constitutional rights.
The Sixth Amendment gives us the right to a speedy trial. "The prosecution must be "ready for trial" within six months on all felonies except murder, or the charges are dismissed by action of law without regard to the merits of the case." So, no matter what the DA could keep Neil in there for another month and a half it seems unless he can arrange bail.
Dr Gary Michelson, Michelson Prize, $75 million, Found Animals Foundation, Dr. Gary Michelson, Gary Michelson, Gary, Michelson, Gerald, Michaelson, Gary Michaelson, G Karlin Michelson, Mary Cummins, Animal Advocates, marycummins.com, animaladvocates.us, Gary Karlin Michelson, Gary K Michelson, Karlin Michelson, Alya Michelson, Aimee Gilbreath, teak, farm, billionaire, Forbes, lawsuit, fraud, pitbull, purebred, bribe, bribery, patent, spine, animal nut, patent troll, thief, criminal, childhood, philadelphia, pennsylvania, boca de canon, Los Angeles, California, Ed Boks, Edward Boks, Antonio Villaraigosa, steve cooley, jackie lacey, campaign, donation, district attorney, inventor, hall of fame, grandmother, hand, fire, burn, 20, million minds, text book, free, surgery, surgical, twenty million minds, dog, high school, law, lawyer, doctor, dr., Michelson Medical Research Foundation, foundation, wilshire, Karlin Asset Management, KAM, Found Animals Legislative Fund, mom, dad, mother, father, brother, Gracie, bull, spay, neuter, adopt, buy, capital, karlin ventures, david cohen, tianxiang zhuo, spinal, surgeon, ceo, Karlin Real Estate, charity, 501 3c, irs, nonprofit, non-profit, Gary Karlin Michelson M D Charitable Foundation, gay, homosexual, wayne pacelle, hsus, animal services, temple university, medical, school, born, flake, crazy, central high school, Hahnemann Medical College, drexel, jewish, russian, Medtronic, Wikipedia, grant, $25, $50, Kremlin, mail order bride, Karlin Holdings Limited Partnership, C & M Investment Group Limited, michelson technology at work, Karlin Opportunity Fund, Karlin OP, Medical Research Foundation Trust
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)